By Wojtek Kolan - April 23, 2025
Zandschulp is scheduled to play Struff on Thursday at 10:00 AM CET, in the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, First round.
Form
W W L L W L W L W L
Form
W W L L L L L L L LCalculated from the implied probability from the moneyline, Struff has a 43.54% chance to win.
IMPORTANT: Join the Matchstat.com tennis picks club to compare implied vs our expert predictions to discover profitable bets in order to make successful bets.
| Match | BOOKIE PREDICTION |
BOOKIE ODDS |
|---|---|---|
| Jan-Lennard Struff | 43.54% | +121 |
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 56.46% | -142 |
Above is implied from odds. Login / Register to find out our expert predictions with edge / profit forecast. |
Zandschulp and Struff have faced each other in 5 sets, with Zandschulp taking 3 and Struff 2. Their most recent encounter was at the BMW Open in Munich on April 18, 2024, where Struff triumphed 7-6(0) 6-4 on clay. Who will come out on top in their next match?
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Jan-Lennard Struff | 1 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Struff |
|---|---|---|
| 43% (10-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 21% (3-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 88 | Ranking | 79 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 21 |
| 29 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 13 |
| 62% (363-227) | Career Total W/L | 57% (578-438) |
| $3,456,920 | Career Prize Money | $5,247,770 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
24 Apr 2025 / First
Botic Van De Zandschulp implied favourite from odds → 58.68%
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(0) 6-4 |
Stats 
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 6-2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
21 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 28 | Games Won | 22 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 12 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:58:10 | Average Match Time | 1:58:10 |
| 70% (131/186) | 1st Serve % | 61% (101/166) |
| 72% (94/131) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (68/101) |
| 45% (25/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (33/65) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 19% (3/16) |
| 39% (65/166) | Return Points Win % | 36% (67/186) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid
Clay| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Total Matches | 1st Match |
| 3:16:42 | Last Match | 1st Match |
| 4:34:14 | Total Time | 1st Match |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 1st Match |
| 11 | Aces Total | 1st Match |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 1st Match |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1st Match |
| 66% (116/176) | 1st Serve % | 1st Match |
| 76% (88/116) | 1st Serve Win % | 1st Match |
| 42% (25/60) | 2nd Serve Win % | 1st Match |
| 62% (8/13) | Total Break Points Won % | 1st Match |
| 69% (9/13) | Total Break Points Saved | 1st Match |
| 85% (23/27) | Service Hold (%) | 1st Match |
| 70% (19/27) | Opponent Hold % | 1st Match |
| 41% (69/168) | Return Points Win % | 1st Match |
| 53% (182/344) | Total Points Won | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreak Win % | 1st Match |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 1st Match |
| 1.00 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 1st Match |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 1st Match |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 1st Match |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
When it comes to serving with enthusiasm and gusto, Struff seems to have the slight upper hand on the court. In the latest six-month performance shindig, Struff has managed to bag 46.95% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp trailed behind with a not-too-shabby 43.27%. It's like they’re serving up slices of victory pies!
The return game is another arena where these two players show off their prowess. Zandschulp, armed with a racket and a dream, has snatched 46.74% of points from his opponent's second serve. Meanwhile, Struff, not one to be outdone, picked the lock on 48.89% of such points. Awkwardly enough, when it comes to handling their rival's firing cannon-first serves, Zandschulp stands at 27.22%, while poor Struff seems to need a few more training sessions with just 21.75%. Critics say these numbers are like crystal balls for predicting favored match winners.
When the going gets tough, the tough must learn to duck! Zandschulp has saved nearly half of the breakpoints, escaping doom 49.77% of the time. Struff, on the other hand, has turned the breakpoint drama into a comedic escape artist act with a saving performance rate of 63.84%. You can almost hear the crowd holding their breath with each tennis ball lob.
Last year, Zandschulp managed to win 51.43% of his duels, tallying a record of 36 wins to 34 losses. Struff, doing his best brave stance, fell just behind with a 47.73% winning ratio (21 wins, 23 losses), leaving us pondering about the quirks of fate in their head-to-head clashes.
The battle of turf heroes sprinkles more flavor onto the prediction pie. Zandschulp flourishes on I.hard surfaces, with a sparkling winning percentage of 63%. Grass, however, is not his best dance floor at a 46% win rate. Struff, meanwhile, feels pretty groovy on Clay with a 62% success rate, though the grass might have him tripping up at 45%.
In the Main Tour, our friend Zandschulp kept busy, winning a respectable 44.44% of his matches (12 wins, 15 losses), while Struff has been putting on a valiant knightly show, picking up a 52.38% rate with 11 wins and 10 losses. When the stars align and they meet in the tennis coliseum, it’s important to consider who faced more valiant foes; Zandschulp's average opponent had a ranking of 144.21. Meanwhile, Struff was grappling with more well-ranked beasts, boasting an average opponent rank of 91.14, as if he had been consulting the tennis epic tale “How to Slay Ranked Dragons.”
Close encounters of the tennis kind aren't new for them. Having faced each other twice, they've each tasted sweet victory once. Across five nail-biting sets, Zandschulp claimed three while Struff scurried away with two. Their last skirmish, occuring at the BMW Open - Munich on clay, saw Struff victorious by a whisker, with a score of 7-6(0) 6-4.
Should this battle exceed the normal limits of tennis endurance and go into a deciding set, Struff seems less likely to have made peace with such an ordeal, winning just 33% of decisive games in the last year. Zandschulp, though, has somehow grokked the peculiar witchcraft by winning 42% of those high-stakes sets.
Whether you’re dabbling in the dark arts of in-game betting or simply a tennis aficionado, the stat sheet suggests that Zandschulp’s slightly superior performance in return games, breakpoint conversion, and the treacherous deciding sets might just tip the scales in favor of “Zandschulp the Brave.” As the records whisper, keep an eye on Struff though; it may just be another day for the knights on clay!
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
63%
(
72 of
115)
1st Serve %
69%
(
84 of
122)
6
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
61 of
84)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
44 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
48 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(3) 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Moise Kouame
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
11
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
47%
(
18 of
38)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
94%
(
17 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valentin Vacherot
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Fonseca
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
36 of
68)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
29 of
36)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
71%
(
65 of
92)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
8
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Hugo Grenier
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
77 of
115)
16
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
115)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Manuel Guinard
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
48%
(
47 of
97)
18
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Struff is now available here.
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (170/105) | Win/Loss | 62% (272/170) |
| 60% (385/256) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (633/437) |
| 54% (3168/2695) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5508/4736) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 802 | Aces Total | 1988 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 879 | Total Double Faults | 1157 |
| 1:23:29 | Average Match Time | 1:10:2 |
| 423.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 501.64 |
| 61% (9560/15649) | 1st Serve % | 55% (13308/24262) |
| 69% (6571/9560) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (9726/13308) |
| 48% (2919/6089) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5567/10954) |
| 45% (848/1880) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (977/2383) |
| 43% (7088/16307) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9757/24664) |
| 63% (165/263) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (254/412) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 52% (33/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (84/166) |
| 52% (45/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (78/150) |
| 90% (164/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (266/227) |
| 10% (164/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (266/39) |
| 21% (110/23) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (176/45) |
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
